patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Should Private Schools With 'Anti-Gay' Policies Get Public Funding?

A report released in January names some Gwinnett County private schools as those receiving state dollars despite "anti-gay" policies. Do you think this is a fair practice in your community?

 

According to a report recently released by the Southern Education Foundation, some scholarship money generated through a Georgia tax credit program has been used at religious schools that ban gay, lesbian and bisexual students.

And, those schools should not be given the public funding, the report asserts.

At least two of the schools named in the report are located in Gwinnett County:

In 2008, legislators established a tax credit program to allow individual and corporate taxpayers to contribute to qualified student scholarship organizations and receive a dollar-for-dollar credit against their Georgia income tax liabilities. SSOs provide the funds to private schools for all or part of a student’s tuition.

Although the amounts awarded to each school are unknown, more than $170 million in taxpayer funds have been set aside to cover the tuition costs of students in private schools during the last four years.

And, the Southern Education Foundation knows of at least 115 private schools in the tax credit scholarship program that have severe anti-gay policies or belong to state and national private school associations that promote anti-gay policies, according to the report.

"Altogether, as much as one-third of all private schools participating in Georgia’s tax credit scholarship program may be governed by the schools’ explicit anti-gay policies or their church’s anti-gay statements of faith," the report reads.

And that count, according to the report, is likely an understatement.

The Southern Education Foundation does not take issue with the policies of the schools. They have a constitutional right to believe whatever they want to believe and to operate their private affairs in accordance with those beliefs, the foundation said.

But schools that "exclude, condemn, and demonize students for who they are and who they accept in their lives" should not receive public funds, the foundation wrote in its report. "Tax dollars should go to schools that educate all students. That is the promise and virtue of our democracy."

Click here to read the full report from the Southern Education Foundation. It is also attached to this article as a PDF. Click here to read about other metro Atlanta schools listed in the report.

Should public money be used to assist needy families who want to send their children to private schools with explicit anti-gay policies? Tell us in the comment section below.

Related Topics: Southern Education Foundation and anti-gay

Cheryl Brownstein

10:11 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Absolutely not. Replace "gay" with "black" or "hispanic". The question would not even be asked.

Reply

Marie

10:34 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

You cannot compare homosexual behavior of any GLBT behavior with race. There is no gay gene and such talk is merely lying propaganda because the GLBT community has absolutely no proven or reasonable arguemnents in their favor. There has been extensive research done on DNA and genetics and no link between GLBT behavior and DNA has been found. Their behavior is a choice, not genetically determined. And this contribution in exchange for tax credits is for contributing to qualified student scholarships which is a program that is not run by the school or the school's policies. No one has the right to take it away from them just because you don't like the school's policies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Brownstein

11:10 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

When did you choose to be straight? Show me the straight DNA if that is what you are basing your argument upon.

Comment_arrow

Jason Caldwell

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

If your faith practices bigotry and hatred, that is your right to subscribe to those Neanderthal beliefs. The US has said that all people are created equal. If a school wishes to say that not all people are equal based on religious dogma, that is their right, but they will be doing it on their own, not by receiving a subsidy from the government to promote their message of hatred and intolerance.

Comment_arrow

Afairhope

3:34 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Marie, Are you a geneticist? You do not know if homosexuality is a choice. I personally do not believe that a person decides one day, gee I think I'll be a homosexual.

Hal Schneider

10:35 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Try reading the law. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue. It doesn't really matter what anyone else thinks is "fair". Private Institutions can impose whatever restrictions they wish on their members. If you don't like it, don't send your kids. Simple.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Afairhope

3:37 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I agree, a private school should be able to take any student that they want, Just don't take any government funds or tax subsidies.

Hal Schneider

10:42 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I'll tell you what. When you come out in opposition to public funds for Planned Parenthood, maybe I'll take you seriously! But when liberal groups want to be selective about where public funds are used, i.e., only in areas/causes that THEY support, it is nothing but hypocrisy!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Brownstein

11:14 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Okay, I'll play your game. Should schools that do not allow Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim or any other religious group get public funding?

Comment_arrow

Hal Schneider

11:50 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

If they are "private schools" they can choose WHOMEVER they wish to be members! Why is that so hard to understand?

Not wanting to change the subject, but, in truth, State and Federal public funds should not be spent on education, period....in any circumstance! Education is a local issue and should be funded 100% by local communities!

Comment_arrow

Will01

1:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Apples and oranges. Planned Parenthood doesn't refuse to provide services to certain groups of people, and the public funds that go to Planned Parenthood are used for things like birth control, cancer screenings, and family planning education (not abortion). They offer those services to anyone who walks in the door. Public funding should not go to organizations that exclude people.

Comment_arrow

Hal Schneider

1:23 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

The argument is that you don't want public funds to go to organizations that don't share YOUR belief system. Planned Parenthood doesn't support my belief system. The argument that they don't use public funds for abortions is a non-sequitor. By using public funds for other services, they redirect other donations to abortions. Money is fungible in these organizations. Without public funds, Planned Parenthood would be unable to perform the 300,000+ abortions that they do every year!

Marie

11:50 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Why should GLBT groups get public funding? Do hetersexuals get public funding because of their sexual orientation?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jonathan Weintraub

12:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Absolutely. Did you know that Congress just spent $3,000,000 to defend a ridiculous heterosexual privilege to... Oops!

http://www.equalityloudoun.org/2013/01/28/worst-argument-ever/

Comment_arrow

Jason Caldwell

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Heterosexuals aren't being persecuted by zealot homosexuals. The same is not true the other way around.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:30 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I don't have a problem with anyone that is gay. The problem starts when they try to get people to accept it as natural.
When was the last time you saw a Straight Pride Parade?

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:30 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I don't have a problem with anyone that is gay. The problem starts when they try to get people to accept it as natural.
When was the last time you saw a Straight Pride Parade?

Marie

11:54 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

My aguement is that sexual orientation is not genetic. Show me a gene that shows what sexual orientation you are and I bet the first thing that will happen is someone in some country will learn how to detect it in an embryo so that selective abortions can occur. GLBT people might prefer GLBT babies through artificial insemination. Some people (not necessarily Christians) would prefer not to have a GLBT baby.

Reply

Marie

12:05 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Everyone of my relatives and the majority of my friends either went to private schools that didn't allow students who engage in pre-maritual sex, use drugs, alcohol, or cigarettes. If you did do that & corrected your behavor you might be able to stay. Almost no one was removed from school because the parents agreed to the rules. The public schools had high pregnancy rates, high drug, alcohol, & cigarette using rates and a drop out rate...our drop out rate was zero. We were taught anatomy & physiology, not sex education which is the parent's right & duty to do. Some of my relatives/friends were home schooled. At public school the parents lose parental rights the minute their kids enter school grounds. Without parental knowledge or consent teachers can take students to nurse/doctors on/off campus for vaccinations, birth control, abortions, etc. Teachers also can take them to counselors on/off campus including those at the Gay-Straight Alliance who may have had sex change operations, be GLBT, engage in polyamorous relationships, sado machism, group sex, and many other lifestyles. Teachers can say whatever they want regarding sexuality to students & parents have no rights or knowlege of it unless their child tells them. Parents can only take their kids out of school. This is why we need to pass the Parental Rights Amendment which gives parents the right to have a say in their child's education, health care, & well being. I would never allow a child to attend public school

Reply
Comment_arrow

JL

12:29 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

You are very confused about what is allowed and available in public schools. Marie. As a parent of two public school children, I have lost NOT ONE of my rights regarding my children. Are they exposed to diverse groups, including GLBTs, Muslims, Jews, Christians, Indians, Asians, Hispanics and many others? YES! And thank goodness, because that is how the real world works. Are they around people who have made bad decisions (Smoking, drugs, etc.)? YES! And because I, as their parent, have done my job and taught them since birth how their decisions will effect their lives - they know what to do. My children will leave our public schools, with not only a wonderful education (which I enrich and expand upon - again, MY job as a parent) but also with knowledge of how to conduct themselves and how to work with a wide variety of different people. Good for you and your private education, and good for you if that is what you want for your children, but stop slamming those of us who have made a different choice for ours. YOU DON"T GET TO JUDGE EVERYONE ELSE!!!!!! I know a wide variety of GLBT individuals, including teachers, managers, artists, students, blue collar, and white collar - they are wonderful people who deserve all the opportunities that others are given. Why you, or anyone else, should believe that you get to judge a person based on who they love is absurd. If a private school wants to exclude them, they shouldn't get public money, it's a simple as that.

Comment_arrow

rebecca olesen

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

JL is a good example of a typical fascist personality type.

quote: YOU DON"T GET TO JUDGE EVERYONE ELSE!!!!!!

Well, JL, isn't that exactly what you are doing? Telling EVERYONE ELSE that they should be EXCLUDED because they do not agree with your philosophy?

Good for you if that is what you want for your children, but not everyone else does. You don't have the right to tell other people what they have to accept any more than they have the right to tell you. AGAIN, which is exactly what you are doing.

The world doesn't ''work like that''. Go to any islamic country, an Asian country, etc., and see how 'diverse' their schools are. THEY ARE NOT. The only part of the world where people like you insist that the world is like that all over, are countries that were founded on Christian principals, and created by Europeans, and much to our detriment.

What you promote, is that you think the world SHOULD be like that, whether it is, whether or not everybody agrees; and that people who don't obey your ideals should be punished financially by having their choices of schools dictated only by other people like you. THAT'S FASCISM.

The schools themselves are not the recipients of tax dollars, the PARENTS of the students receive the tax credits. It is their right to send their children to a religious school that teaches whatever values the parent follows, NOT YOURS.

Comment_arrow

Will01

1:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Where the hell is this public school you're talking about, Gomorrah? It is absolutely false to say teachers can take students off campus without parental consent for vaccinations or any other reason. It's false to imply that students can somehow be forced to interact with Gay/Straight Alliance counselors. It's false that teachers can say whatever they want regarding sexuality. Might students at public school actually have to meet and interact with gay people on a regular basis? Sure. That's part of life. Will they be forced into graphic sex education or dozens of forced off-campus trips to a vaccination-happy mad scientist? No. Not at any school system in the country. Not without parental consent.

Comment_arrow

Jason Caldwell

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Way to go JL. "they are wonderful people who deserve all the opportunities that others are given." This is the core issue that unfortunately the overly religious seem to miss out on the message that Jesus was supposed to be promoting. Everyone is HUMAN, black, white, gay, straight, Asian, rich or poor. The message of tolerance has been lost in a fervor of misplaced righteousness and what people see as an attack on their faith. No one is attacking Christian faith by removing public funding to schools that practice exclusion. Those schools are welcome to their faith, no matter how misguided it may be, it is their right to believe that nonsense. Just like Pastafarians who believe in the Flying Sphagetti Monster. But do expect public funding if you make it a point to say that you are going to practice bigotry.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:40 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I don't know where Will01 lives but there were 3 stories on the news THIS WEEK where schools took students off campus without parental consent.
One was to a Mosque and the students were seperated and the boys had to say a prayer.
The parents had NO IDEA that it happened and the school system just said oops we made a mistake.

Comment_arrow

Will01

12:17 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Rusty: You mean the field trip to a Mosque in Boston, in 2010, was on the news this week? A field trip that, yes, required parental consent and included parents and grandparents of students as chaperones:

http://www.boston.com/yourtown/wellesley/articles/2010/09/18/wellesley_pupils_prayers_at_mosque_fuel_call_for_policy_change/?page=2

The issue there was over the prayer, not parental consent. And that was based on one witness who claimed that the boys had been forced to participate. Other witnesses said it was not even suggested that they should participate, but a few did so out of respect, much as I participate out of respect when visiting the place of worship of another faith.

My mother has been a public school teacher for 40 years in systems across the country, and I called her to get her take on this. Simply put: Off-campus trips require parental consent at some stage of the game, period. I'm not saying maverick teachers have never taken students off campus without consent, but those who do are asking for a lawsuit.

Marie

12:12 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

My arguement is that sexual orientation is not genetic. Show me a gene that shows what sexual orientation you are!

Reply

Marie

12:19 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

This school is not receiving public funding...only public tax credits for participating in a qualified student scholarship program which is not likely to be one run by the school. Why shouldn't people who send their kid's to private school get a tax deductioin for the cost of their kid's education since they are paying (involunarily) taxes that go to public schools but the government is not paying for their education?
And why should people who have no children have to pay taxes that go to public schools? It's not our responsibility.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JL

12:33 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Because everyone benefits from an educated society. It's sad that your private education neglected to teach you that. With your line of thinking, should I not have to pay for the fire department since my house has never caught fire?

Comment_arrow

Mr. B

1:41 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Very good questions Marie. And a good answer JL with one exception. We are doing a poor job educating our children. So many can't even read upon graduating from high school. So, why should I spend money on that? I would prefer not to pay taxes for education since I don't nor ever have had kids in the GA public school system. But since I am forced to pay them, shouldn't I be allowed to designate where they are used?

Comment_arrow

rebecca olesen

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

@JL, (not directed at Marie)

Yeah, cause the USA has benefited so tremendously from it's ''well educated'' society due to the wonderful standards of public schools. HA !

Comment_arrow

Will01

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Because you don't get to pick how your tax dollars are used. I'm a pedestrian who barely ever needs to use the roads. That doesn't mean I'm going to demand a refund of the portion of my taxes that goes toward road construction.

Comment_arrow

Afairhope

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

If you get tax credits you are in fact getting funding.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:43 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

What Marie is saying is that the parents of these kids are ALREADY paying into the system for someone else's kid to be educated. Why can't they use this money as THEY see fit.

Your argument about the fire does not hold water (pardon the pun) because YOU are paying for YOUR house not your neighbor's.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:45 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

@Will01 ... you don't pay road taxes, that is derived from taxing gas and since you are a pedestrian.............

Comment_arrow

Will01

12:03 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Rusty:
Point taken, and thanks for the correction. A more germane example, then: I was vehemently against the war in Iraq, but my federal tax dollars went, in part, to fund that war. But I don't expect a refund. Once again, the system would not work if taxpayers only paid for what they agreed upon or the services they personally planned to use.

Shane S

12:20 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Well said, Hal and Marie; very well said..

Reply

Marie

12:22 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Since you are willing to show a leave a question to me regarding genetics but are not willing to allow me to answer it...you have a biased agenda and are not willing to show both sides or the arguement. If you didn't want me to answer the questions on genetics then you shouldn't have allowe the question. Neither I or any of my friends or relatives will be reading your web site...it is to biased.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason Caldwell

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

It is actually "riddance". I hope you find tolerance and peace for all people which is what Christian faith is about.

Michael k

12:37 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Marie,

This link is to a genetic study of male sexual orientation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1845227

I agree with Hal. We should not restrict public funding to organizations that I prefer. Therefore we should not restrict public funding to those I oppose. (Hal, I know your point is actually that public funding shouldn't be used for either.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

r patton

1:34 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

The "fly" in this study is, "it was done by the government". Need I say anymore?

Hal Schneider

1:05 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Michael, you are correct, I do not support public funding (from State or Federal level) of education period, HOWEVER, IF we are going to provide it, then ti should be provided to ALL without any restrictions based on enrollment. This is just another way for the government to "bribe" people to behave the way that they want us to behave. This is exactly why I oppose public funding. Those in control of the money, use it to advance their personal agenda...in this case they are attempting to advance their pro-GBLT agenda by punishing people who have an opposing view on the subject. This is an insidious use of taxpayer funds!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:50 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Hammer meet nail head!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Linda Vest

1:16 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

It takes away your choice where you want to go to school. Remember it is the person who wants to go there and is reaching our for funding so yes if they are eligible for the money they should get to go where they want to as long as it is accredited.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Afairhope

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

No one is taking your choice away, it just says if you want to private school your children you pay for it. Private schools in the South proliferated after schools were segregated in the mid-sixties. Most of them had one purpose, that purpose was to keep white children from going to school with black children. It is still like that in my opinion. Many whites have been trying to do away with public schools since Brown vs Board of education in 1954.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

1:19 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

@ Afairhope... private schools proliferated AFTER they started taking GOD out of schools. The majority of private schools are RELIGIOUS not segregated. I went to one and it had NOTHING to do with trying to be segregated.

Carolyn Diamond

1:34 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Marie, I'm guessing that you also think that global warming and the theory of evolution are hoaxes. Am I right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hal Schneider

2:57 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Carolyn, that is the typical tactic of the left. Throw out red herrings which have ZERO to do with the conversation at hand and insult people who have an opinion different from theirs.

Comment_arrow

rebecca olesen

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

what does any of those snotty sarcastic and rude things you just said have to do with anything Marie said? Are you trying to say that genetic predisposition to being homosexual is accepted by the scientific community as a proven theory? Because it's not, it's not proven. It doesn't matter whether or not I believe some people were born that way, because I do, but I also believe others who are gay were not born that way and due to circumstances became homosexual.

Either way, global warming isn't accepted by the entire scientific community either.

Just because you believe in something or agree with it or are in favor of it, that has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not other people should be forced to, or else they can't get tax credits to send their children to the school of their choice, but only YOUR CHOICE.

p.s. statement in a recent genetic study of males and whether or not genetics are related to 'gender non conformity'.
Thus, childhood gender nonconformity does not appear to be an indicator of genetic loading for homosexuality.

Comment_arrow

William Evelyn Jr.

1:04 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Carolyn - I actually know that global warming is a hoax. The earth is actually cooling. Sun spot activity is very low. Liberals prove the theory of evolution. Liberals are de evolving.

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

2:54 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Who has EVERY said that global warming AND global cooling do not exist?
Now MAN MADE global warming I will argue about. Of course the globe warms and then it cools it is cyclical.
Some people even call it SEASONS

Comment_arrow

Jason Caldwell

3:01 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Global warming is a real and measurable ongoing event. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

3:41 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Changes in Mars' south polar cap may represent climate change, but this is likely due to phenomena particular to Mars.
Changes in Neptune's brightness do seem to correlate with changes in the Sun, but the linking mechanism (if any) is unknown.
Changes in Pluto's atmosphere seem to be seasonal; work is ongoing on this topic.
In the cases of Mars, Neptune, and Pluto, our understanding is incomplete. They may prove to have no connection to mechanisms for natural climate change on Earth. At the same time, some global warming believers have been too hasty in dismissing these observations. Still, they do demonstrate that we don't fully understand climate change.

Michael k

12:57 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

To be fair the red herring is a tool of choice used by the right and left.

For example, pointing out that a genetic study of male sexual orientation was produced by *the government* is a ploy to distract from providing Marie "a gene that shows what sexual orientation you are!"

A popular red herring deployed by the gun supporters is to ask why the government doesn't want to restrict access to cars, hammers, knives because people kill with those as well.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

3:00 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

It does raise an agenda question though. If the government was TRULY concerned about deaths and the way to keep people from killing each other would they not try and ban EVERYTHING on the list you provided??
More people are killed with cars, hammers and knives every year than guns by a LONG shot!! Pardon the pun.
Makes you wonder does it not?

Jonathan Weintraub

12:58 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

When public funds are used, the recipients must comply with accepted legal and moral standards. Schools that discriminate against students, faculty and staff based on real or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity must not receive taxpayer funds.

Thank you for the article. The >30% number reveals that there is a strange synchrony amongst the schools. This synchrony is indicative of a conspiracy, most likely involving elected officials, to take public tax dollars and funnel those funds into sectarian madras-like religious studies that harm and propagandize vulnerable students.

Reply

suzanne

12:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Students should be thinking about learning not sexuality.

Reply

suzanne

12:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

And Yessssssssss global warming is the biggest hoax!!

Reply

Diana

1:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

My two cents.
If it is against the law to have anti gay policies and you do ban gays then you shouldn't expect government funding.
That said
If a faith based organization doesn't expect or receive government funding then people need to back off and allow them their rights to believe as they chose.

Reply

Diana

1:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

ps Carolyn um you do realize it's called The Theory of Evolution for a reason right, they don't call it The Theory of Creationism..... just saying

Reply

Charles Allen

1:04 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Hey, there are more queers and freaks in private schools than anywhere on earth!!! So, they are actually just trying to cover up the fact that everything they profess to be against are in reality their truer colors.. Sad lil creatures...

Reply

Tina Dillard

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I do not think they should. Whether it be money or credits. I agree with whomever stated "replace that with black or hispanic". Whatever happened to THOU shalt not judge? Guess these schools missed that boat? They may not personally aprove of gays and lesbians, but they should not ban them or treat them differently period. That is the real issue here is the school promoting these views.

Reply

JenniferC

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

These are not "PUBLIC" funds. This tax credit program allows individuals and corporations to directly contribute a portion of their projected tax liability to a Georgia SSO (Student Scholarship Organization). In doing so, they also specify which school they are donating their funds to. Why stir up such controversy? If you are going to ask the question, please make sure you what you are talking about. The Southern Education article was purposely misleading...and you just carried it further.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Afairhope

2:49 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

If you are getting a tax credit from the government then they are public funds whether you think they are or not. with a tax credit the government is forfeiting whatever the amount of tax credit is.
Someone said that if you send your children to a private school you shouldn't have to pay for public schools. In all places that I know schools are partially financed by property taxes. So, if you own property and pay property taxes you support public education. I've never had any children, but I have paid for a lot of public education.
One thing a private school can do and the government will not bother them is to take no public funds.

Chris P

1:06 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I believe they should receive public funding. Their admission policies are based on their standards. Why should they be punished for upholding their moral beliefs?

Reply

Michael k

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

To be fair the red herring is a tool of choice used by the right and left.

For example, trying to shift focus by making a point that a genetic study of male sexual orientation was produced by ***the government*** is a ploy to distract from providing Marie "a gene that shows what sexual orientation you are!"

Reply

Michael k

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Another frequently used red herring is to wonder why the government isn't looking to offer up any new hammer or automobile restrictions since those are used by people to end the lives of other people.

Reply

Afairhope

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Private schools should not get any government money or in kind assistance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

3:43 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Well then the reverse should be true. If your kids go to private school then you should not have to pay school tax.

Elizabeth

1:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Regarding paying public school taxes when one has no children in school: While I no longer have children in school, I do have grandchildren in school (public schools, all). Realizing that I could not have afforded the good public school education (along with encouragement from home), my children got, I do not begrudge paying school taxes for other people's children, many of whom would have no education if their parents had to foot the bill on their own.

Reply

Diana

1:15 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

my kids went to private school for a while and so did my grandkids so why should I pay for them to go to school to be under educated and under protected and taught crap I don't believe in? If your kids are in private school you shouldn't have to support public schools. Period.

Reply

Mark Rockingham

1:48 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

The purpose of the credit is to provide in a small way school choice, not your particular issue. Homosexual behavior is still considered deviant sexual behavior in most community. If that offend someone, then select a different school. But don't attempt to prevent like minded individuals or those who are not offended by the position of a religious school from selecting schools based on what is best for their children. Some position themselves like they dictate how all tax dollars should go. This credit is and should be about a child getting the best education possible, and this choice should be that of the parent, not some special interest group.

Reply

Rusty Taylor

2:21 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

OHHHH I see, you only get the scholorship if you go to the school that THEY see fit for you. They don't care where the student or the parent wants the child to go.
Kind of like do as I say not as I do!!!
It is not like they came up with this policy last week.
They are called PRIVATE schools for a reason.
And by the way we are not talking about regular tax dollars, this is a special account set up SPECIFICALLY for this purpose so it is not EVERYBODYS tax dollars.

Reply

Afairhope

2:27 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

You can school your children anyway you like, but why should I pay for it? A tax credit is government money. The government should not support any religion sponsored school, to carry it further churches should only get tax exemption for actual charitable work that is done in a non-sectarian manner. Many churches are far from non-profit and many do no charitable work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Rockingham

5:15 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

why should I pay for obama care, or what about all the years I was single without a child in school. My property tax paid for a lot of schools which I never used. why should my tax dollars pay for planned parenthood? why should the government take my tax dollars and pay for a service that I was not going to use. I guess we don't always get a choice. Don't know what church that you have been attending, but most do some charitable work.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

7:30 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Why should I have to pay for war? Or no-bid padded defense contracts? Or Congressmen or state legislators who work for lobbyists and special interests and themselves instead of for the people who voted them in? For Congressional junkets and partying at taxpayer expense? Or ER care for people who don't buy insurance or pay their own way? For bridges to nowhere or municipal airports in the boonies with little to no traffic? For any of the Congressional pork projects all over the country, for foreign aid? We all share the expense of living in a civilized, modern, convenient society - that's why. We don't get to choose. We do get to vote.

Comment_arrow

Hal Schneider

11:16 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

GGY, but you want to decide who should and shouldn't be eligible for a tax credit, based on YOUR criteria.

This is why ALL state and federal subsidizing of education is a bad idea. It is used by those holding the purse strings to reward those who "think" like them and punish those who don't.

100% local control of funding for schools is the only sane answer!

Comment_arrow

Mr. B

8:58 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"A tax credit is government money."

Not the first dumb thing I've heard today but certainly one of the dumbest. Government money? Wouldn't that be OUR tax dollars. Wouldn't WE be the government? Shouldn't WE decide where our money is spent?

I don't want to pay any tax. Toll roads, private security, fire protection provided by your insurer just like the old days. When we let government get involved, things went downhill fast and are still declining...at a faster rate.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

8:40 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

@Hal - no, I recognize that it's not up to me or my "criteria". Too bad so many others don't. It is up to Constitutional law - you know, that document that the right supposedly reveres and no one else does?. There must be separation of church and state. As is fully evident on these threads - not everyone's religion is the same. It's a parent's choice whether to public school, home school or private school. They choose to forfeit tax dollar assistance when they pick a school that discriminates for any reason, be it religious, racial, political, ideological. That's their choice.

Comment_arrow

Mr. B

8:50 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

So GGY, show me in Constitutional law where the US government has the right to tax its citizens. Show me where and why we have to "choose to forfeit tax dollar assistance."

Here is a hint for you: Don't waste your time looking because it isn't in there.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

1:53 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Damn, Mr. B! I guess we've all been duped for 200+ years!

Except, wait . . .

"Section 8. Clause 1. The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States."

I believe this is known as the General Welfare Clause.

And, the 16th Amendment authorizing federal income tax:
"Passed by Congress on July 2, 1909, and ratified February 3, 1913, the 16th amendment established Congress's right to impose a Federal income tax."

Afairhope

3:18 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

If you get credit for taxes you would otherwise owe you are getting government funds, in fact there are some tax credits that are sent to non tax payers who qualify for the credit. If you are getting a tax credit you are getting government funds period. The government already subsidizes children through the Child Tax Credit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty Taylor

1:26 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Actually a tax credit does not mean that you are getting government money, a tax credit means that they are allowing you to keep more of YOUR MONEY.

Afairhope

8:06 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Good Grief Y'all, I agree with you on a lot of things, although I don't think that is the subject being discussed. Being from GA it's true we don't have anyone representing us that pays any attention to what the constituency thinks. When asked how much government do you want, the respondent said, "enough to give me what I want and to deny the others".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

8:52 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Huh? I was commenting on the fact that we taxpayers don't get to choose how our tax dollars are spent, and I illustrated some of the ways that I disagree with the spending. Others on this thread were doing that, too. To clarify, I was responding to Mark's reply to you - not directly to your post. I didn't see the comment, "When asked how much government do you want, the respondent said, "enough to give me what I want and to deny the others."

But, thanks for the acknowledgment of sometime agreement. That's rare for me. I don't expect anyone to agree with me on everything, and many on nothing. So, I'll take it. Basically, I come here to state, not debate.

Glenn

8:43 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

So many hearts, so much anger.

Reply

Racer X

8:53 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I'm with Hal. The Federal government shouldn't be involved in the education process at all, public or private. When the feds involved, they get to mandate what is taught. Our children are taught the government's version of history and are being formed to the Fed's agenda rather than our own.
As far as the gay issue, I really just don't care. I think way too much attention is given to gays, especially when you consider the relatively tiny percentage of the population they represent.
US adults think the gay population is as high as 25% while, in reality, it is a mere 3.5%. Let queers do what they want. It's not really going to affect normal people much at all.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/147824/adults-estimate-americans-gay-lesbian.aspx

Reply

Afairhope

9:16 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

For Mr. B, I'm not trying to say what is right or wrong or whether it's good or bad, all I'm saying that if you owe taxes and you get a tax credit the government is forfeiting money due. I didn't make the law and didn't even say that I agree with it. My position is that private schools, church sponsored or otherwise should not get government support.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. B

9:37 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

We agree on that except I don't think it should even be a discussion item. You don't want to see tax monies used for private schools. I don't want to see government collect and distribute tax monies into any school system. Keep our money out of politicians hands and give it to schools we choose for our children. I have never had children in GA schools yet I have paid more tax into the school system than most Georgians.

Good Grief Y'all

8:58 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Without public education and tax-dollar support, you would see widespread educational disparity in our communities. There are many rural and poor districts with little local revenue and citizens with low-paying jobs who couldn't afford to educate their children privately. Some of the best minds come from those areas. What a shame to waste them. How heartless not to care.

Reply

Leave a comment